And here are the front and back flaps.
As always, click for all the wonderful detail.
So what makes this a success, in contrast with the Jason/Kerouac cover? Without compromising his style, Seth has designed something entirely appropriate to the writer and the era he is covering. It incorporates examples of her work and style, and manages a number of clever, witty flourishes. It has been done with obvious affection for Parker, but with a clear-eyed vision of her flaws as well. It is, quite frankly, one of the best examples of cover design I've seen.
2 comments:
I think your wrong about Seth. That cover looks exactly the same style as the covers he has designed for Fantagraphic's Complete Peanuts by Charles Schulz. I suppose it is not so bad with Parker, because as far as I am aware, she is not already associated with any graphic style? But I hate the Peanuts covers by Seth. Same muted colours, same amount of think black lines, same black shadows, etc. I didn't realise Parker was gothic noir.
Too much Seth, too little Parker/Schulz. Bleh
Fair do's about the Peanuts covers, but I still love his Dorothy Parker cover. It's rather more lighthearted than gothic noir, surely? It just looks very 1920s/30s to me.
Post a Comment